“The question then becomes why Greece
fared so poorly and how that performance contributed to its recent
economic disaster. The most straightforward interpretation of the Greek
figures is that it simply failed to integrate effectively with the rest
of the European economy. The rest of the periphery was tying itself into
EU supply chains, experiencing capital deepening and ungrading
technological capabilities, contributing to a rise in underlying growth
potential. Greece wasn’t. The southward rush of capital that occurred in
the 2000s may therefore have pushed Greece much, much farther beyond
potential than was the case in Spain or Portugal. In other words, we see
another example of the way in which the Greek government’s profligacy
was more symptomatic of the economy’s troubles than a principal cause of
them.
There may be a bright side here for Greece. If a failure to integrate helps explain recent woes, then perhaps that also means that Greece has more capacity to grow rapidly in future as it goes through the integration others enjoyed previously. Assuming, that is, that Greeks themselves remain committed to a club that has yielded them paltry benefits relative to what might have been expected.”
The original FT article can be found here.
There may be a bright side here for Greece. If a failure to integrate helps explain recent woes, then perhaps that also means that Greece has more capacity to grow rapidly in future as it goes through the integration others enjoyed previously. Assuming, that is, that Greeks themselves remain committed to a club that has yielded them paltry benefits relative to what might have been expected.”
The original FT article can be found here.
No comments:
Post a Comment