The election campaign is on and the first polls are out. Still, it doesn't feel like there is an election fever around; not yet, at least.
I have come across a rather interesting analysis by Dean Plassaras, a commentator with whom I hardly ever agree but who is making a rather convincing case below:
"There used to be a time that a Greek political party would take over governance via elections for roughly a 2-4 year period and then pass on the mess created as a liability for the next (successor) party. This for years was the political ping-pong played between ND and Pasok as we knew it in Greek politics.
This is no longer the case because of the Troika or Quadriga's presence. In essence (and despite the deep injustice of the whole set up) the government which will take over Greece in 2-4 years from now is guaranteed to have a much better managed economy and a platform to claim future success. Therefore the old model of passing along your mess and poison the well for the successor party does not exist in Greek politics anymore (for as long as Quadriga's supervision of Greece is on - which for purposes of this analysis let's assume it will be for a long time).
The upside of this new Greek political reality is that, at tremendous social and political cost, a sort of financial equilibrium has been achieved. The downside of this new reality is that you don't want to be the party that implements this austerity model because (a) basically you no longer govern without Quadriga breathing down your neck and (b) the damage to your name and reputation would be great and impossible to either ignore or absorb.
Taking all of the above into account, the bottom line is that you should avoid being the governing party in Greece at this particular point in time because your damages/losses would be far greater than imagined. Therefore (and let's invoke Game Theory terms) the whole strategy and tactics must ensure how this burden of "high wear and tear governance" mode is taken over by (more likely forced upon) your opposition.
Therefore it's quite clear that Tsipras' best choice is to allow ND to win the next parliamentary election."
Whether or not Tsipras will opt for this 'best choice' remains to be seen. He did have a similar option back in December of last year. Had he not forced early elections upon the country, he could have gathered support while in opposition for another year (or more) while the economy would have recovered a bit more and become a bit stronger to cope with SYIRZA's government style. Back then, immediate power seemed more important to Tsipras than a strategic take-over. Chances are that he will now again go for power even if he eventually collapses under the weight of responsibility.
I have come across a rather interesting analysis by Dean Plassaras, a commentator with whom I hardly ever agree but who is making a rather convincing case below:
"There used to be a time that a Greek political party would take over governance via elections for roughly a 2-4 year period and then pass on the mess created as a liability for the next (successor) party. This for years was the political ping-pong played between ND and Pasok as we knew it in Greek politics.
This is no longer the case because of the Troika or Quadriga's presence. In essence (and despite the deep injustice of the whole set up) the government which will take over Greece in 2-4 years from now is guaranteed to have a much better managed economy and a platform to claim future success. Therefore the old model of passing along your mess and poison the well for the successor party does not exist in Greek politics anymore (for as long as Quadriga's supervision of Greece is on - which for purposes of this analysis let's assume it will be for a long time).
The upside of this new Greek political reality is that, at tremendous social and political cost, a sort of financial equilibrium has been achieved. The downside of this new reality is that you don't want to be the party that implements this austerity model because (a) basically you no longer govern without Quadriga breathing down your neck and (b) the damage to your name and reputation would be great and impossible to either ignore or absorb.
Taking all of the above into account, the bottom line is that you should avoid being the governing party in Greece at this particular point in time because your damages/losses would be far greater than imagined. Therefore (and let's invoke Game Theory terms) the whole strategy and tactics must ensure how this burden of "high wear and tear governance" mode is taken over by (more likely forced upon) your opposition.
Therefore it's quite clear that Tsipras' best choice is to allow ND to win the next parliamentary election."
Whether or not Tsipras will opt for this 'best choice' remains to be seen. He did have a similar option back in December of last year. Had he not forced early elections upon the country, he could have gathered support while in opposition for another year (or more) while the economy would have recovered a bit more and become a bit stronger to cope with SYIRZA's government style. Back then, immediate power seemed more important to Tsipras than a strategic take-over. Chances are that he will now again go for power even if he eventually collapses under the weight of responsibility.